Quantcast
Channel: Questions in topic: "splunk-enterprise"
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 47296

Why is universal forwarder installation failing with error "Could not bind to port 8089" using the deployment server option hostname:port (8089)?

$
0
0
Installing universal forwarder is failing because it cannot bind to TCP 8089. My understanding of TCP communications is this: Client reaches out to destination server via a dynamic TCP Port to a destination TCP port which is static. (server is listening on static port 8089) If that is accurate: When installing the universal forwarder on a client and using the deployment server option hostname:port (8089), why is the install failing because a process already has the 8089 port in use (on the client). If my understanding is correct, then the client shouldn't care if it already has a process listening on TCP 8089 because when it reaches out to the indexer hostname:8089 it will be sourcing from a dynamic tcp port. Bottom line, I cannot get the universal forwarder because w3wp.exe is already using 8089 on my client and I cannot change it. Thanks in advance for any help. FROM SPLUNKD.LOG 06-16-2016 15:37:27.372 -0500 FATAL HTTPServer - Could not bind to port 8089

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 47296

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>