Quantcast
Channel: Questions in topic: "splunk-enterprise"
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 47296

whitelist match issues

$
0
0
Hi everyone, I am having an issue where a logical AND NOT isn't working properly. Simply put I have an alert for mail servers that should be whitelisting a single IP's communication with either one of two IPs. index=* tag=network NOT (src_ip=10.100.90.34 AND dest_ip=10.100.1.1) NOT(src_ip=10.100.90.34 AND dest_ip=10.100.1.2) (dest_port=25 OR dest_port=465 OR dest_port=2525 OR dest_port=110 OR dest_port=995 OR dest_port=143 OR dest_port=993) NOT [ | inputlookup Inventory | eval category=split(asset_category, "|") | search category="Email" OR category="Mail" | return 100 $asset_ip ] | eval is_local=`local_ip_list(src)` | where is_local=1 | stats earliest(_time) as Timestamp, values(dest) as "Destination IP", values(app) as Application, values(dest_port) as Port, values(user) as Username, earliest(_raw) as "Raw Log", count by src | convert ctime(Timestamp) | rename count as Correlated src as "Source IP" | search Correlated >29 My issue is that the alert is firing for communication between 10.100.90.34 and 10.100.1.1 or 10.100.1.2, IP A,B and C respectively. I've tried `NOT(A (B OR C))` Also: ` NOT(A B) NOT(A C)` Based on both logical expressions the results should not include communication between those 2 devices. **Note:** I am unable to modify the inventory lookup table, *and*, I have tried the search without the sub-search with the same result, except of course having my lookup table results included in the alert. Thanks for taking the time to read this.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 47296

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>